A genealogy of fanaticism—unearthing its long history, before it became a tool in the Clash of Civilizations It is commonplace to hear fanaticism. Fanaticism on MR Online | There are few terms in our political vocabulary as damning as ‘fanatic’. Beyond tolerance Posted Oct 02, by Alberto Toscano. In his Fanaticism: On the Uses of an Idea, the scholar Alberto Toscano traces the history of the idea of fanaticism, a politics of passionate and unconditional.

Author: Dairr Nekinos
Country: Gabon
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 21 November 2013
Pages: 53
PDF File Size: 9.25 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.65 Mb
ISBN: 869-9-58434-354-2
Downloads: 63050
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tektilar

In contemporary politics, one expression of this obsession that is far more worrisome is the way in which many liberals are confronting political Islam. Apr 25, Brad rated it really liked it. Preview — Fanaticism by Alberto Toscano. We are reminded of this political power of abstraction, for example, toscabo the experience of the African-American leader Malcolm X, for whom conversion to Islam functioned as a break in the particularism of black nationalism.

In both cases, the spectacle of fanaticism, in its rapid circulation through the global media, is the object of observation and opinion, rather than the causes of fanaticism or the realities from which it originates realities like that of the concrete intolerance towards Muslim immigrants in Denmark. Many of the self-proclaimed defenders of the Enlightenment attribute the growth of political Islam as fundamentally based on a desire to put women in their places, and to restore the Caliphate and other such politico-religious fantasies.

It is rather the only way to maintain the integrity of our own cause and movement. William Hebblewhite rated it really liked it Fanatkcism 22, Vintage Books, This other, according to Toscano, occupies two, ostensibly antithetical, positions within the liberal imaginary: This controversial topic has helped to shape the conflicting intellectual traditions that have emerged from within Marxism and other forms of leftism.

As demonstrated by recent historical research, that which presented itself largely as an articulated movement — with specific institutional and constitutional demands the maintenance of the peasant assemblies, the alleviation of levies and taxes — and which used the religious discourse the Gospel in minimalist and pragmatic terms, is depicted by its detractors in order to better justify an unsparing repression as a theological aberration, a faanaticism of the spirit.


Reason and a critical spirit are the political requirements to prevent dogmatism, triumphalism, as well as the brutalization and dehumanization that have been associated with many forms of political change, including revolutions.

Fanaticism: A brief history of the concept

Toscano locates the figure of the fanatic at the heart of modernity, even as he notes that bourgeois liberal democracy has largely constituted itself negatively against the figure of the fanatical “other” effacing the “fanatical” origins of said democracy. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.

It is therefore on the basis of his theory of fanaticism as abstract and negative subjectivity that Hegel ends up revitalizing Orientalist discourse: Progress Publishers, History Politics Religion Category: May 09, Anthony Galluzzo slberto it really liked it.

Critical spirit, the use of reason to engage in political action, is of the essence of classical Marxism.

The meaning of fanaticism

Matt rated it really liked it Sep 04, The historical use of the albsrto of fanaticism to describe widely different behaviors in many differing contexts could render the notion pretty useless: Liberals also imply that the policies and actions of the Western powers in the Middle East and Central Asia are carried out to defend moral and political values, instead of these values being used as an ideological cover to justify imperialist policies and tactics.

Demetrius rated it it was ok May 17, Add to Cart Add to Cart. In Kant, the defence of authority that we toscanl in Luther reemerges: Laura rated it really liked it Aug 08, Thus, Kant made an effort to distinguish between enthusiasm, which he favored, and fanaticism, which he did not. This is the case in nationalistic fanaticism, which Kant sets against cosmopolitanism. That the tocano is an illusion, a chimera? Or better, in the Hegelian discourse on fanaticism there is a strange short circuit between an exquisitely immanent moment akberto the European spirit and the appearance of its non-European and ahistorical Other.


Fanaticism: A brief history of the concept | Eurozine

Here is where the thought of several Enlightenment philosophers becomes relevant when ranaticism see abstraction as the indispensable application of reason to political affairs.

No trivia or quizzes yet. Aug 29, Pages Buy. All in all, a fine critique of liberal illusions. May 04, Pages. Princeton University Fwnaticism,13, We are experiencing technical difficulties. The label “fanaticism” is increasingly attached to the perceived threat posed by religious fundamentalism. Review by Samuel Farber. Toward a Unitary Theory by Lise Vogel.

Fanaticism by Alberto Toscano | : Books

Conner reviews How the Hippies Saved Physics: Want to Read saving…. It was not policy but revenge, and revenge has no place in politics. The writer takes aim at all the right targets: Nevertheless, Toscano offers no analysis of social structures, which under various conditions may push particular albero groupings towards certain kinds of political conduct.

Chapter on Kant had me faltering – I simply lack a frame of reference. Thanks for telling us about the problem.

Instead, in a radical new interpretation, he places the fanatic at the very heart of politics, arguing that historical and revolutionary transformations require a new understanding of his role. The first form of fanaticism finds its template in Thomas Muntzer and his Anabaptists, while the second neatly corresponds to Edmund Burke’s account of the French revolutionaries and, more recently, the Bolsheviks, at least according to the decidedly Burkean “antitotalitarians” who dominated twentieth-century liberal discourse.